| |
| Home | Campaigns | News | Events | |
||||||||||||||||||
CPRE Oxfordshire Campaigning to protect Oxfordshires's countryside for 75 years |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
The Proposed Upper Thames Reservoir |
|||||||||||||||||||
CPRE opposes the proposed Upper Thames Reservoir, believing that Thames Water should concentrate on reducing leakage and improving water efficiency. In April 2007, the Environment Agency published regulations that meant that Thames water had to begin the examination of the case for the reservoir again and the whole planning process was delayed by at least two years. On May 7 2008, Thames Water published its draft Water Resources Mangagement Plan (WRMP).
Latest News
GARD commissions an expert on water resources to scrutinise Thames Water's WRMP The Group Against Reservoir Development (GARD) has commissioned an expert on water resources to bring Thames Water's latest report under the spotlight. It raises serious doubts over the case for a giant reservoir between Wantage and Abingdon. The company's 900-page Water Resources Management Plan (WRMP) published in May, predicts water will start running short in six years' time, unless water-saving schemes are put in place alongside the £800 million reservoir, planned for 2021. But in a 60-page analysis, retired professor Chris Binnie, claims Thames Water has not adequately justified the need. He said its arguments and figures had serious limitations resulting in conclusions which were not ‘robust’. The Campaign to Protect Rural England, Oxfordshire, contributed significantly to the consultation.
Thames Water publishes its draft Water Resources Management Plan (WRMP).On May 7 2008, Thames Water published its draft Water Resources Mangagement Plan (WRMP) 'Water - planning for the furture', setting out the water company's plans to manage water supply and demand over the 25 year period from 2010 to 2035. The draft Plan sets out how Thames Water plans to ensure there will be sufficient water available to meet its customers’ needs over the next 25 years. New resources such as the reservoir proposed for the Upper Thames region in Oxfordshire will be 'essential' said Thames Water Chief Executive David Owens in a press release 'Your water, your future' issued on the same day.Public Consultation The 16-week public consultation was launched on May 7 and comments on the draft Plan are invited online. The consultation is web based and is being facilitated by an independent company at: http://www.thameswaterconsult.co.uk.You can register now for the online consultation, and the plan will be available to view from 7 May. All comments must be received by 27 August 2008. Thames Water will also be holding exhibitions in the Abingdon area throughout May and June, for further information on dates and venues go to: http://www.thameswater.co.uk/utmrd or email: utmrd@thameswater.co.ukThe Environment Agency and Ofwat will make representations to the Secretary of State at the end of the consultation period. The final plan will be published in 2009.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Plan of proposed reservoir |
Perspective of proposed reservoir |
|
![]() |
||
Click for larger image. Source: Thames Water. |
Click for larger image. Source: Thames Water (perspective corrected to give a more realistic idea of the height of the embankments). |
The reservoir embankment near Steventon will be about 15 metres high, ie. the same height as the nearby church. The tower is shown against the cross-section of the embankment. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
CPRE's Position on the Reservoir
Bruce Tremayne, Chairman of CPRE Oxfordshire, criticises the rush to construct a reservoir before other options have been exhausted.
We do face a growing water shortage in the South East. But before we disrupt and destroy so much of Oxfordshire's landscape, we must save water rather than waste it. We argue that the priority is to change the landscape of peoples' minds rather than the landscape of Oxfordshire. Every householder should think about how to use less water and Thames Water must deliver on better management of existing supplies before it pushes ahead with giant engineering proposals which impact on cherished landscapes.
We are calling for a series of actions by Thames Water, the Environmental Agency, Ofwat and the public.
Reduce water leakage
Rates of water loss in the Thames area are too high. In the year to March 2007, Thames Water lost 790 million litres a day through leakage. This is the equivalent of about 235 litres for every property—much more than the household consumption of 154 litres a day (source: Thames Water). Ofwat calls for a reduction of leakage to 725 million litres a day by 2010.
It will be costly to replace decayed supply systems, many of which are more than a century old. But there can be no purpose in the expensive construction of a new source of supply only to waste the product through leakage. A proposal for an Upper Thames Reservoir should not be entertained until leakage is significantly reduced at least to the levels required by Ofwat in 2010 and we would wish to see tough targets for reduction of leakage after 2010.
Encourage lower water usage
There is an urgent need for research into water usage in the region and incentives for reduction of use. At a minimum, we call for metering of all consumers in the southeast before plans for the reservoir are considered. (Thames Water installed meters in just 0.32% of households in its area in 2003/04). All new houses need to be built to ensure minimum water usage.
Pursue alternative options
All available options to the reservoir need to be considered including a cluster of smaller storage areas and replenishment of aquifers. Landscape and environmental considerations must take equal place with financial factors in any review of these proposals.
Reduce personal usage
Regardless of the Thames Water proposal, Southeast England is short of water. You can help by reducing your own water consumption (and your water bills):
The Environment Agency on the Reservoir
The Environment Agency believes that Thames Water has not fully answered the following three questions:
Local Opposition
There is strong local opposition to the scheme led by the Group Against Reservoir Development (GARD).